Wszystkie wpisy, których autorem jest admin

Telling the Story of Graphic Design

Post pobrano z: Telling the Story of Graphic Design

Let me just frame this for you: we’re going to take a piece of production UI from a Sketch file, break it down into pieces of information and then build it up into a story we tell our friends. Our friends might be hearing, or seeing, or touching the story so we are going to interpret and translate the same information for different people. We’re going to interpret the colors and the typography and even the sizes, and express them in different ways. And we really want everyone to pay attention. This story mustn’t be boring or frustrating; it’s got to be easy to follow, understand and remember. And it’s got to, got to, make sense, from beginning to end.

I’ve asked my colleague Katie to choose a component she has designed in Sketch. I’ll go through and mark it up (we mainly use SCSS, Twig and Craft but the templating language is not very important), then she will respond briefly. Hopefully I’ll get most of it right, and then one or two things wrong, so we can look at how things get lost during handoff.

In white label or framework type front-end, the focus is on building pieces that are as flexible and adaptable as possible, as content and style-agnostic as possible (within the scope of the product), because you simply will never know where the code is going and for what, ultimately it is being used. But recently I moved to a web design agency, which has a complete inversion of this focus. It is particular. It is bespoke. It’s all about really deeply engaging with the particular client you have and the particular clients they have, and designing something that suits them, as a tailor would.

Working so closely with a graphic designer like Katie, with highly finished pixel-spaced UI, instead of directly from wireframes or stories is an adjustment and an education, but there are still lots of things I can bring to the table. Chiefly: document design.

Document design, which admittedly is just the old semantic web with an accessibility hat on, is really looking at graphic design, engaging with it as a system of communication, and translating the underlying purpose of the colors/type/layout into an accessible, linearizable, and traversable DOM. It’s HTML, kids. It’s just HTML. You’d think we all knew it by now… but look around you. You’d be wrong!

Katie has slung me a Sketch file chock full of artboards, and she’s pretty great at writing out what she wants so I don’t have to think too hard:

Event card

First I look through the whole UI file and figure out what is actually a card on this site — it turns out there are six or seven components that use this paradigm. Let’s make some observations:

Zoom out on section of artboards
Another card, classes this time.
  • A card is a block of meta data about a page on the site.
  • It has an image/media and metadata — it’s a media object.
  • It’s shown in a group of objects.
  • That group is always typed (there’s no view where there are search results and news articles and classes are all mixed up).
  • Each object has a single link to a page and no other actions.
  • Each object has a call to action (Book, etc.).
  • Each object may have times, categories, badges, and calls to action.
  • Each object must have media, title, and link.

So a card is the major way my user is going to find their way around this site. They are going to be clicking through guided pathways where they get a set of cards they can choose from, based on top pages like „what’s on” or „classes.” They’re not getting options on this card. It’s not really an interactive element — it’s a guide, an index card, that sets her onto her path: in this case a purchase path where she books a ticket for a show at this arts centre.

Before going on, let me just frame this for you:

Imagine you were looking at a flyer for a show and discussing it on the phone. If you actually wanted to go to this show in real life. What would you do? You wouldn’t just read the flyer out, would you? That’s the text. And it might have all kinds of random stuff on it if you started literally at the top. You wouldn’t start with „Twentieth Century Fox” or „Buy Hot Dog Get Cola Free” or „Comedy Drama Musical Family Friendly.” (I would actually hang up on you if you did!) And you wouldn’t simply describe the color or fonts. That’s the CSS. You’d talk through the information on the flyer. You’d say, „It’s The Greatest Showman and it’s on Tuesday, starts at 7:30. It’s at the Odeon on Oxford Street by the tram.” Right?

This is the document. Keep that person on the phone in your mind.

Count, group, and name

So let’s say we’ll deliver a card as the inside of a list item. We want a group and that group should be countable. We’ve already named the page with an <h1> so we’ll introduce and describe the group with a heading, an <h2>. First we’ll name it, then we’ll deliver it, so someone using a screen reader can:

  1. Get the list signaled in the headings overview.
  2. Get a count up front of the number of items on a page.
  3. Know they can skip to the next list item to get the next card.
  4. Know they can skip the group at any point and go to the next page — the pagination is the very next element and it will be labelled as a landmark.

See the Pen
Cards delivered as a countable list with descriptive heading
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

Anchor

In this particular case, I’m gonna wrap this whole card in an anchor element (<a>). There’s only one link on the card and I want to front load that information so someone can click as soon as they know it’s the right card, instead of having to search forward for the action. A big clickable area is nice too, though of course that can be taken too far and make an interface a sort of booby trap! But these cards are not too enormous and I can see they have a nice gutter around them, so there’s a rest space that will reduce accidental clicking for people with more limited dexterity.

Title

Event card „title” element

Then we’ll jump down a heading level and mark up the name of each show as a heading, an <h3>. The designer has made this type the focus and we will too. Some people browse super fast by jumping to the next heading, then next heading, so I’m not going to put any important information before the heading — they’ll jump right over it. I will put the image there, though, as I know in this case, I can’t get meaningful image descriptions from the API so those images are hidden and have empty alt attributes. Now the user can guess (correctly in my case) that the developer is actually describing the content in some meaningful way and might flip back to headings overview (list headings level 3) and just get a list of the shows.

Now let’s deliver our metadata. Let’s list it:

  • Badge
  • Date/Time
  • Categories

Badge

Event card „badge” element

This seems to be something the venue adds to a card to highlight it. As a developer, I can’t immediately see why a user would look for this, but it’s emphasized strongly by the designer, so I’ll make sure it stays in. Katie has moved the badge up out of the flow, but I know that with a headings jump our user could miss it. So I’ll just put the wording directly after the title, I think. I’ll either put it first or last, so make it easier to account for in a non-visual browse and not be too crazy paving in a tabbing, visual browse.

<p class="c-card__badge"><abbr title="Harrow Arts Centre">HAC</abbr> Highlight.</p>

…But on second thought, I won’t put an <abbr> after all. It’s the brand color, so it’s really a statement of ownership by this venue, and we’ve already said HAC a million times by now, so the user knows where they are.

<p class="c-card__badge">HAC Highlight </p>

See the Pen
Badge
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

A quick aside: the 'badging’ is very specific to this organisation. They want to show people clearly and quickly which events they’ve programmed themselves, and which are run by other organizations who’ve hired their venue.

Date/Time

Event card „date/time” element

Now date and time. Katie is keying me in to this decision point by styling the dates in bold. Dates are important. I’m going to pop it in an <h4>, because I’m thinking it looks like someone might be quickly scanning a page of events looking for the matinee, for example, or looking for a news article published on a particular day. I don’t always put dates into headings, especially if there are millions on a page, but I do always make sure they’re in a <time> element with a complete value so the <time>Thu</time> or <time>Mon</time> Katie has specified is read out as comprehensible English words „Thursday” instead of garblage. I could also have used hidden completion or <abbr> with a title.

Categories/ Tags

Event card „categories/tags” element

Next come the categories, and I’m putting them after badge and date. This section is next in the visual order reading top-to-bottom, left-to-right, of course, but it also seems to be deprioritized: it’s been pushed down on the left and the type is smaller. This works for our linear storytelling. As a rule, we don’t want people to sit through repeated or more general content (cinema, cinema, cinema) to get to unique or more specific content (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). Remember, we are inside our card: we know it has already been sorted in a few general ways (news, show, class, etc), so it’s likely to have a lot of repeated pieces. We want to ensure that the user will go from specific to general if we can.

There is a primary category that is sorted first and then some other categories sometimes. I won’t deliver this as a countable list as there’s mostly just one category, and loads of lists of one item is not much use. But I will put a little tag beforehand because otherwise, it’s a slightly impenetrable announcement. MOVEMENT! SPOKEN WORD! (I mean, you can work it out retrospectively, but we always try to name things first and then show them, in linear order. This isn’t Memento.) I used to use title="" fairly heavily but I’ve gotten complaints about the tooltip so I route around. Note the use of colon or full stop to give us a „breath.” That’s a nice bit of polish.

<p class="c-card__tags h-text--label>
  <span class="h-accessibility">Categories: </span>
{% for category in categories.all() %}
  <span class="c-card__tag c-tag">{{category}}{% if not loop.last %} / {% endif %}</span>
{% endfor %}</p>

Also I’m hard-coding in my spaces to make sure the categories never run together into complete garblage even with text compression or spaceless rendering turned on somewhere down the pipeline. (This can happen with screen readers and spans and it’s rather alarming!)

There’s a piece of this design I will do in the CSS but haven’t really pulled into the document design: the color-coding on primary category. I am not describing the color to the reader as it seems arbitrary, not evocative. If there were some subtextual element to the color coding beyond tagging categories (if horticultural classes were green, say), then I might bring it through, but in this case it’s a non-verbal key to a category, so we don’t want it in our verbal key.

I’m sorting the primary category to the front of the category paragraph, but I’m not labeling it as primary. This is because there’s a sorting filter before this list that sorts on primary category, and it’s my surmise that it would be easier and less annoying to select a category from that dropdown than to read through each card saying Categories Primary Category Music Secondary Categories Dance. I could be wrong about that! Striking a balance between useful and too much labeling is sometimes a bit tricky. You have to consider the page context. We may be building components but our user is on a page.

See the Pen
Dummies in page context
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

Action

Event card „action” element

Last, the action. The direction to the user, to Book, or Learn More, or whatever it is, has been styled as a button. It’s not actually a button, it’s just a direction, so I’ll mark it up as a span in this case. I definitely want this to come last in the linear document. It’s a call to action and also a signal that we’ve reached the end of this card. The action is the exit point in both cases: if the user acts, we go to the target entry; if they do not, we go to the next card. We definitely never want any data to come after the action, as they might have left by then.

See the Pen
Card
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

My conclusion

This markup, which counts, groups, and names data, delivers linear and non-linear interactions. The page makes sense if you read it top to bottom, makes sense if you read parts of it out of context, and helps you jump around.

Katie, over to you…

Katie Parry, designer

What an ace article! Really interesting. (I particularly like that „Mon,” „Tue,” etc. on cards are read as „Monday,” „Tuesday”… smart!)

One thing that struck me is that using assistive tech means users get information served to them in a „set” order that we’ve decided. So, unless there’s a filter, someone browsing for dance events, for example, has to sit/tab through a title, badge, dates, and maybe several other categories to find out whether an event’s for them or not. Bit tiresome. But that’s not something you’ve got wrong — it’s just how the internet works. Something for me to think about in the future.

Most of our clients are arts and cultural venues that need to sell tickets for events so I design a lot of event cards. They’re one of the very first things I’ll work on when designing a site. (Before even settling on a type hierarchy for the rest of the site.)

Thinking visually, here’s how I’d describe the general conventions of an event card:

  • It must look like a list – so people understand how to use it.
  • It needs to provide enough information for folks to decide if they’re interested or not. (The minimum information is likely an image, title, date, and link.)
  • It needs to include a clear call to action — usually a link to find out more information.
  • It needs to be easily scannable, visually.

Making information visually scannable is a pretty straightforward case of ensuring every information type (e.g. image, title, date, category, link) is sitting in the same place on every card and follows a clear hierarchy.

I focus a lot on typography in my work anyway but clearly: titles are styled to be highly prominent; dates are styled the same as each other but are different from titles; categories look different again – so that folks can easily pick-out the information they’re interested in from simply scanning the page. I’m composing the card for the user, saying, „Hey, look here’s the event’s name, this is when it’s on — and here’s where you go to get your tickets!”

The type styles – and particularly the spacing between them – are doing a lot of work, so I will point out here that the spacings are not quite right in the code sample:

Spacing between the title and dates, dates and button, and button and piping don’t match the design.

This is important. Users need to be able to scan information quickly as they aren’t all looking for the same thing in order to make the decision to go to an event. Too much or too little space between elements can be distracting.

Here, let me tighten that up for you:

See the Pen
Card with accurate spacings
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

Perfect!

Some people just want a general mooch at what’s coming up at their local venue. Others may have seen an advert for a specific show that tickles their fancy, and want to buy tickets. There are people who love music but don’t care for theatre who just want a list of gigs; nothing else. And some folks who feel like going out at the weekend but aren’t that fussed about what it is they go to. So, I design cards to be easy to scan — because most users aren’t at all reading from top to bottom.

Despite the conventions I just laid out, cards certainly don’t all look the same — or work in the same way — across projects.

There is always a tension in web design between making an interface familiar to the user and original to the client. Custom typefaces and color palettes do a lot here, but the other piece of it is through discovery.

I spend time reading-up about a client, including who their audience is by reading what they say on review sites and social media, as well as working directly with the client. Listening to people talk through how they work, what feedback they get from their audience/users often uncovers some interesting little nuggets which influence a design. Developers aren’t typically involved much in discovery, which is something I’d like to change, but for now, I need to make it super-clear to Sally what’s special about this event card for each new project. I write many, many (many) notes on Sketch files, but find they can tend to get lost, so sometimes we have a spreadsheet defining particular functionality.

And soon a data populator instead! 😛

See the Pen
Cards in page context, scraped from production
by limograf (@Sally_McGrath)
on CodePen.

The post Telling the Story of Graphic Design appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

Datalist is for suggesting values without enforcing values

Post pobrano z: Datalist is for suggesting values without enforcing values

Have you ever had a form that needed to accept a short, arbitrary bit of text? Like a name or whatever. That’s exactly what <input type="text"> is for. There are lots of different input types (and modes!), and picking the right one is a great idea.

But this little story is about something else and applies to any of them.

What if the text needs to be arbitrary (like „What’s your favorite color?”) so people can type in whatever, but you also want to be helpful. Perhaps there are a handful of really popular answers. Wouldn’t it be nice if people could just select one? Not a <select>, but a hybrid between an input and a dropdown. Hold on though. Don’t make your own custom React element just yet.

That’s what <datalist> is for. I just used it successfully the other day so I figured I’d blog it because blogging is cool.

Here are the basics:

See the Pen
Basic datalist usage
by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier)
on CodePen.

The use case I was dealing with needed:

  1. One <input type="text"> for a username
  2. One <input type="text"> for a „flag” (an aribtrary string representing a permission)

I probably wouldn’t do a <datalist> for every username in a database. I don’t think there is a limit, but this is sitting in your HTML, so I’d say it works best at maybe 100 options or less.

But for that second one, we only had maybe 3-4 unique flags we were dealing with at the time, so a datalist for those made perfect sense. You can type in whatever you want, but this UI helps you select the most common choices. So dang useful. Maybe this could be useful for something like a gender input, where there is a list of options you can choose, but it doesn’t enforce you actually choose one of them.

Even lesser known than the fact that <datalist> exists? The fact that it works for all sorts of inputs besides just text, like date, range, and even color.

The post Datalist is for suggesting values without enforcing values appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Post pobrano z: Affinity Publisher: Your Guide to InDesign’s New Rival

Adobe InDesign has long been the market leader in publishing software. But rival layout design programs are starting to make waves in the market, with Affinity Publisher being the latest to offer a competitive alternative to InDesign.

affinity logo

If you’re a seasoned print designer or are looking to dip a toe into publishing design, you’ll want to read on to discover our assessment of Affinity Publisher and whether we think it’s a decent alternative to Adobe’s publishing giant.

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

What Is Affinity Publisher?

Affinity Publisher is a publishing program for Mac and Windows that allows you to create single- and multi-page documents. Publishing programs are suitable for creating layout-based media, which combine typography, graphics, and photos, such as magazines, brochures, flyers, and books. Most publishing programs allow users to create content for both print and online, as well as EPUBs (eBooks). 

affinity sample layout

Serif released the full version of Affinity in June 2019 (it had previously only been available in beta format). Fans of Affinity Photo and Affinity Designer, decent and good value alternatives to Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, will find that Publisher makes a seamless and useful addition to their collection of Affinity apps. 

Through technology called StudioLink, Publisher can be integrated with Affinity’s other apps, Photo and Designer, allowing users to seamlessly create and edit images before integrating them into Publisher layouts. 

studiolink

What’s the Difference Between Affinity Publisher and Adobe InDesign?

For budget-conscious creatives, the main advantage of Affinity Publisher is that it’s excellent value, retailing at just £48.99 (around $64 and AU$87) for the single app download. Users aren’t tied into a subscription model, an irritant for some Adobe users. 

Publisher’s competitive price will make it a serious competitor on price point with Adobe, which offers InDesign CC at a subscription price only, with the single app costing users $19.99 a month. 

In terms of usability, Affinity Publisher owes a great deal to InDesign in terms of functionality and interface. Superficially, the differences between the two are minor, and it really comes down to which program you feel most comfortable with using. 

We took Affinity Publisher for a test drive to see how it compares to InDesign and how it functions as a publishing program. Read on to discover our thoughts on Publisher, and assess whether you should make the switch from InDesign.

What’s Good About Affinity Publisher?

It’s Adaptable for Modern Web Design

The latest release of InDesign CC has certainly improved the web and ePublishing design experience for users, with better capabilities for setting up web-friendly layouts and exporting to interactive formats. However, it appears that Affinity Publisher has put the modern web design process at the heart of its design. 

You can choose from a wide range of screen size options, which include all mass-market up-to-date devices. You can also choose to design specifically for Web or Devices, each of which contains a wide range of pre-saved formats to choose from, including an updated catalog of iPhone, Apple Watch, iPad, Nexus and Kindle screen sizes. 

screen sizes

It’s More Flexible Than InDesign… in Some Ways

Because InDesign is built on foundations which preceded web design, stemming from the technology developed by Quark for the first layout publishing program, QuarkXPress, it is still a traditional print publishing program at heart. 

Publisher by contrast, though inspired by the InDesign interface, doesn’t have the same historical legacy, and there are some features of the program which feel more relevant for how designers work now. 

One example is the ability to set a facing page document to begin on a left-hand page. Sure, this isn’t what you’d want to choose for a traditional multi-page document like a print book or magazine, but there are occasions where you might want to start your document with a two-page spread, like eMagazines or interactive PDFs, for example.

left page start

It’s Speedier and Lighter Than InDesign

One of the main complaints with InDesign is the processing power of the software. It’s a very heavy program, which can have an impact on usability, particularly if you’re working on a laptop rather than a desktop. Switching the Display Performance in InDesign to Fast Display can solve the problem, but it also means you have to do the bulk of your work while looking at heavily pixelated images. 

Publisher is a heavy program too, but it certainly doesn’t feel that way. It’s whippet-quick, even when I was trying it out on my ancient laptop, which struggles to open InDesign in less than 15 minutes. 

Images in Publisher remain crisp and clear, which helps you to assess the quality of images accurately while you work. 

image quality

An extra bonus—I had no issues with stalling or crashing, which was an almost daily occurrence when I was working with InDesign CS6 and a monthly occurrence with InDesign CC. 

If You’re an InDesign User, It Feels Intuitive

Serif has mimicked the InDesign interface in Publisher for good reason, in the hope of converting committed InDesign users. 

If you’re a seasoned InDesign user, the Publisher interface will feel very familiar, with the tools panel docked to the left and the most-used panels, including Color, Swatches, and Stroke, docked in their usual position to the right. 

The Pages panel has been shifted to the left, but personally this feels like an improvement on InDesign’s default docking of the same panel to the right of the screen.

interface overview

It Has a Useful Clipboard Feature, 'Assets’

Clipboards are really useful for producing designs that use repeated visual content (such as company logos) or specific sets of icons (such as emojis or UI icons).

Affinity has a handy clipboard function called Assets, which is docked on the left side of the interface, alongside the Pages panel. 

It’s quick and easy to create your own library of asset categories, allowing you to access essential images in an instant. Particularly handy for designers working with brand identities.

assets panel

What’s Not So Good About Affinity Publisher?

Publisher has been tightened up significantly since the beta release, and Serif have obviously benefitted from inviting users to share their thoughts and feedback on the beta version.  

Generally, Publisher is a well-rounded program with all the major features InDesign users would be accustomed to. However, it is admittedly better value than InDesign for a reason—it is overall a less sophisticated program that lacks some of the advanced features InDesign users enjoy.

Here are just a few of the issues I encountered in my (albeit Publisher novice) experience with the program.

Some of the Options in Publisher Are Not Immediately Obvious

Many of Publisher’s 'flaws’ are more to do with the difference between the Publisher and InDesign interfaces. Generally I found I had to take more steps to complete the same action in Publisher, but this is unlikely to bother users who are new to InDesign and Publisher.

In the beta version of Publisher, in the New Document window, the Color Format of the document was not automatically adjusted to the corresponding document Type, but this has since been rectified in the full release.

What is a little different is that the Layout, Color, Margins and Bleed options are organised into separate tabs in the window, meaning that it could be easy to forget to set or check these settings before creating a new document.

new document

For observant (and wide awake designers) this is a minor issue, but there’s something intrinsically helpful about InDesign’s New Document window containing everything you need in one place.

Where’s the Snap?

One of the really nice, but probably under-appreciated, features of InDesign is the ability of the program to ‘snap’ the edges of frames and shapes to other objects. For example, if you’re trying to get two text frames perfectly lined up, InDesign senses what you’re trying to do and produces a ‘snap’ movement and colored line to help guide the frame into position. 

By default, InDesign introduces the snap feature, making it instantly easy-peasy to line up the edges of text and image frames.

Publisher doesn’t apply a snap automatically, but as seems to be the case with most things in Publisher, you just need to do a bit of hunting around and apply the desired effect manually. You can switch on snapping in Publisher by going to View > Snapping Manager and checking Enable snapping.

enable snapping

Affinity Publisher: Our Verdict

If you’re looking for a good value alternative to Adobe InDesign, Affinity Publisher is a no-brainer. 

For marketers needing to create certain items in-house or designers looking to pick up new publishing design skills, Publisher is a budget-friendly and intuitive way to hone your skills and create a wide range of layout media, from magazines to books. For budding web designers, there’s also plenty on offer for creating layouts for websites, apps and EPUBs too.

If you’re a committed InDesign user, you might find it initially difficult to make the switch to Affinity Publisher, as the latter lacks some of the sophistication and advanced features of the former. Publisher can feel a little clumsy in comparison, but this impression quickly diminishes the more time spent using the application.

publisher interface

All in all, Affinity Publisher is shaping up to be a serious rival for InDesign, competing on both value for money and functionality. So watch this space! 

We’d love to know your thoughts on Affinity Publisher. Are you a Publisher convert or die-hard InDesign fan? Leave your thoughts in the comments below. 

Discover thousands of assets to use in your layout designs, from fonts to photos, over at Envato Elements and GraphicRiver.

Check out more reviews of Affinity programs and suggestions for alternative design software:

How to Turn a Landscape Photograph Into an Isometric Icon in Adobe Photoshop

Post pobrano z: How to Turn a Landscape Photograph Into an Isometric Icon in Adobe Photoshop

Final product image
What You’ll Be Creating

Today you will learn how to create an isometric perspective grid in Adobe Photoshop. To make a nice isometric view illustration, we will add some photo textures.

If you’re in a hurry and looking for some ready-made isometric icons to use in your projects (along with many other awesome types of isometric vectors), read this article:

Tutorial Assets

To complete the tutorial, you will need the following assets:

1. How to Make an Isometric Grid

Step 1

First of all, we need to add an isometric grid to our canvas. You can find instructions for this in the isometric tutorial we published earlier.

Isometric grid

Step 2

Based on the grid, draw a rectangle vector shape on the isometric surface. You can use any color, because this is just a guide for our next photo manipulation process.

Draw basic map shape in isometric perspective

Step 3

Duplicate the vector shape by clicking Control-J, and move it upward.

Draw basic map shape in isometric perspective

Step 4

From now on, you can turn off the grid, because we won’t be needing it anymore.

Turning off the isometric grid

2. How to Build the Soil

Step 1

Draw the left side of the 3D map using the Pen Tool. Double-click its layer shape and then add a Gradient Overlay.

Drawing left side of the shape
Layer style for Gradient Overlay
Left side with gradient overlay

Step 2

Set its Fill to 0%.

Set Fill to 0

Step 3

Repeat the same step on the other side.

Right side

Step 4

Draw a new shape using the Pen Tool, covering the whole map. Add a Gradient Overlay to the shape and then set its Fill to 0%.

Another Gradient Overlay
Layer style for Gradient Overlay

Step 5

Grab the soil texture and place it on top of the map.

Adding soil texture

Step 6

Control-click the left side of the map to make a new selection based on its shape. Click the Add layer mask icon in the lower part of the Layers panel to cut off the rock texture outside the shape.

Adding layer mask

Step 7

Repeat the same process on the other side of the map.

Add soil to the edge

3. How to Build the Hill

Step 1

Grab the hill landscape and overlay it on the map with low Opacity. Position it until you get a nice perspective.

Adding hill landscape

Step 2

Add a layer mask to the landscape photo and then paint with black to hide unwanted areas. In this case, I want to retain the street, the hill next to it, and the tree in the corner. Try to get a natural shape using your brush stroke. We don’t want this to be a flat, box-like shape.

Masking the landscape

Step 3

Let’s go back to the soil. We need to make it darker and more believable. Start by painting shadow on its corner. Add a new layer and simply paint black using the Brush Tool with low Opacity.

Painting shadow on maps corner
Painting shadow on maps corner
Painting shadow on maps corner

Step 4

The result is already much better. Keep on adding black shadow to the soil to make it a lot darker.

Adding black shadow to the soil
Adding black shadow to the soil

Step 5

Next, grab another dirt or soil texture. Paste it on top of the previous soil and set its mode to Overlay. Take your time, add a layer mask, and carefully insert any dirt, rocks, and roots into the soil to make it as realistic as possible.

Add another soil texture

Step 6

Let’s add another landscape image into the map. Place the landscape behind the current hill landscape. Add a layer mask to the landscape image and then paint black to remove most of its content while leaving part of its valley.

Add another landscape
Unneeded areas are now hidden

Step 7

Add a new layer and then paint shadow on areas of the new landscape as indicated below.

Add shadow

4. How to Add the Sea to the Isometric View

Step 1

Now, add the sea image behind the map. Position it where you like it most.

Adding sea image

Step 2

Control-click the base of the map to create a new selection based on its shape. Click the Add layer mask icon to hide unselected pixels.

Adding layer mask to the sea
Adding layer mask to the sea

Step 3

Manually fix broken elements in the landscape, if there are any, by painting them with white using a soft brush. In this case, do this with the rock.

Fixing broken rock

Step 4

To add more waves to the sea, we can simply duplicate the sea image and move it to a different position. Apply the same layer mask as the first one and then hide some of the areas until it blends with the first image.

Adding another part of the sea
Adding another layer mask

Step 5

Select the ocean by Control-clicking on its layer shape. Add a Photo Filter Adjustment Layer with Cooling Filter to increase the contrast of its blue sea surface.

Increase sea contrast
Adding Photo Filter

5. How to Add Details

Step 1

Let’s add more contrast into the scene manually. Start by selecting the main hill. Make a new layer on top of it and then click Edit > Stroke to add a stroke line.

Add contrast to the landscape edges
Adding black stroke
Adding black stroke

Step 2

Apply a Gaussian Blur filter to soften the line, and then reduce its Opacity setting in the Layers panel. If necessary, you can also delete a segment of the blurred line using the Eraser Tool.

Soften the stroke line

Step 3

Repeat this process, and add another shadow by painting with black on a new layer.

Add another shadow

Step 4

Let’s make the road more realistic by adding an unfinished street at the end. Activate the hill landscape layer and then paint with white to reveal a chunk of street hanging outside the map. Right underneath the street, paint black to add thickness to the street and then paint a big soft shadow on the soil.

Add broken street

Step 5

To make it appear more realistic, add a new layer and scribble some short black lines using the Pencil Tool with 1 px brush size on the street. Duplicate the layer, and invert its color to white by pressing Control-I. Move the white scribbles down 1 pixel. Reduce their Opacity setting in the Layers panel.

Make the street more realistic
Adding scribbles to the street
The result after adding scribbles to the street

Step 6

Add another shadow and highlight onto the scene by painting with black and white using a soft big brush with low Opacity.

Adding shadow and highlight

Step 7

Here’s the fun part. The map will not be complete until we have a small car on the empty street. You might notice that in our main landscape there’s a parked car. Select and then copy it to a new layer (Control-J). Place it on the street, add a layer mask, and then hide unneeded pixels by painting them with black.

Adding car
Adding car
Car added

6. How to Add the Background

Step 1

We will use a simple background for this map. Activate the Gradient Tool with a standard white to black gradient. Drag from top to bottom until we have this background.

Add white to black gradient for background

Step 2

Let’s add a shadow underneath the map. Control-click the base to make a new selection. Fill it with black, deselect (Control-D), and then apply a Gaussian Blur filter (Filter > Blur > Gaussian Blur) to soften it. Repeat this process a few times with different Radius settings and layer Opacity until we have a realistic floor.

Adding map shadow
Adding map shadow

Step 3

We may need to draw shadow manually by painting black on the canvas using a big soft Brush Tool with low Opacity.

Adding map shadow

Step 4

This grey background is just too dull. Let’s make it more interesting by changing its color to blue. Add a Photo Filter Adjustment Layer above the background and select Cooling Filter.

Adding photo filter adjustment

Conclusion

Now, we have reached the final result. As you can see, there are no complicated tricks in this tutorial. We only used a simple layer mask and a bit of manual drawing. We made cool isometric perspective illustration in Adobe Photoshop.

I believe that it is important to select the best landscape photos—by doing this, we save ourselves from time-consuming photo editing and can focus on working with the map shape. I hope you understand this tutorial and can follow it easily. If you do follow along, let me know your result. I’d love to see it. Thanks.

Final result

Check out some other awesome tutorials with step-by-step cool isometric view illustrations and our articles about this type of design!

How to Turn a Landscape Photograph Into an Isometric Icon in Adobe Photoshop

Post pobrano z: How to Turn a Landscape Photograph Into an Isometric Icon in Adobe Photoshop

Final product image
What You’ll Be Creating

Today you will learn how to create an isometric perspective grid in Adobe Photoshop. To make a nice isometric view illustration, we will add some photo textures.

If you’re in a hurry and looking for some ready-made isometric icons to use in your projects (along with many other awesome types of isometric vectors), read this article:

Tutorial Assets

To complete the tutorial, you will need the following assets:

1. How to Make an Isometric Grid

Step 1

First of all, we need to add an isometric grid to our canvas. You can find instructions for this in the isometric tutorial we published earlier.

Isometric grid

Step 2

Based on the grid, draw a rectangle vector shape on the isometric surface. You can use any color, because this is just a guide for our next photo manipulation process.

Draw basic map shape in isometric perspective

Step 3

Duplicate the vector shape by clicking Control-J, and move it upward.

Draw basic map shape in isometric perspective

Step 4

From now on, you can turn off the grid, because we won’t be needing it anymore.

Turning off the isometric grid

2. How to Build the Soil

Step 1

Draw the left side of the 3D map using the Pen Tool. Double-click its layer shape and then add a Gradient Overlay.

Drawing left side of the shape
Layer style for Gradient Overlay
Left side with gradient overlay

Step 2

Set its Fill to 0%.

Set Fill to 0

Step 3

Repeat the same step on the other side.

Right side

Step 4

Draw a new shape using the Pen Tool, covering the whole map. Add a Gradient Overlay to the shape and then set its Fill to 0%.

Another Gradient Overlay
Layer style for Gradient Overlay

Step 5

Grab the soil texture and place it on top of the map.

Adding soil texture

Step 6

Control-click the left side of the map to make a new selection based on its shape. Click the Add layer mask icon in the lower part of the Layers panel to cut off the rock texture outside the shape.

Adding layer mask

Step 7

Repeat the same process on the other side of the map.

Add soil to the edge

3. How to Build the Hill

Step 1

Grab the hill landscape and overlay it on the map with low Opacity. Position it until you get a nice perspective.

Adding hill landscape

Step 2

Add a layer mask to the landscape photo and then paint with black to hide unwanted areas. In this case, I want to retain the street, the hill next to it, and the tree in the corner. Try to get a natural shape using your brush stroke. We don’t want this to be a flat, box-like shape.

Masking the landscape

Step 3

Let’s go back to the soil. We need to make it darker and more believable. Start by painting shadow on its corner. Add a new layer and simply paint black using the Brush Tool with low Opacity.

Painting shadow on maps corner
Painting shadow on maps corner
Painting shadow on maps corner

Step 4

The result is already much better. Keep on adding black shadow to the soil to make it a lot darker.

Adding black shadow to the soil
Adding black shadow to the soil

Step 5

Next, grab another dirt or soil texture. Paste it on top of the previous soil and set its mode to Overlay. Take your time, add a layer mask, and carefully insert any dirt, rocks, and roots into the soil to make it as realistic as possible.

Add another soil texture

Step 6

Let’s add another landscape image into the map. Place the landscape behind the current hill landscape. Add a layer mask to the landscape image and then paint black to remove most of its content while leaving part of its valley.

Add another landscape
Unneeded areas are now hidden

Step 7

Add a new layer and then paint shadow on areas of the new landscape as indicated below.

Add shadow

4. How to Add the Sea to the Isometric View

Step 1

Now, add the sea image behind the map. Position it where you like it most.

Adding sea image

Step 2

Control-click the base of the map to create a new selection based on its shape. Click the Add layer mask icon to hide unselected pixels.

Adding layer mask to the sea
Adding layer mask to the sea

Step 3

Manually fix broken elements in the landscape, if there are any, by painting them with white using a soft brush. In this case, do this with the rock.

Fixing broken rock

Step 4

To add more waves to the sea, we can simply duplicate the sea image and move it to a different position. Apply the same layer mask as the first one and then hide some of the areas until it blends with the first image.

Adding another part of the sea
Adding another layer mask

Step 5

Select the ocean by Control-clicking on its layer shape. Add a Photo Filter Adjustment Layer with Cooling Filter to increase the contrast of its blue sea surface.

Increase sea contrast
Adding Photo Filter

5. How to Add Details

Step 1

Let’s add more contrast into the scene manually. Start by selecting the main hill. Make a new layer on top of it and then click Edit > Stroke to add a stroke line.

Add contrast to the landscape edges
Adding black stroke
Adding black stroke

Step 2

Apply a Gaussian Blur filter to soften the line, and then reduce its Opacity setting in the Layers panel. If necessary, you can also delete a segment of the blurred line using the Eraser Tool.

Soften the stroke line

Step 3

Repeat this process, and add another shadow by painting with black on a new layer.

Add another shadow

Step 4

Let’s make the road more realistic by adding an unfinished street at the end. Activate the hill landscape layer and then paint with white to reveal a chunk of street hanging outside the map. Right underneath the street, paint black to add thickness to the street and then paint a big soft shadow on the soil.

Add broken street

Step 5

To make it appear more realistic, add a new layer and scribble some short black lines using the Pencil Tool with 1 px brush size on the street. Duplicate the layer, and invert its color to white by pressing Control-I. Move the white scribbles down 1 pixel. Reduce their Opacity setting in the Layers panel.

Make the street more realistic
Adding scribbles to the street
The result after adding scribbles to the street

Step 6

Add another shadow and highlight onto the scene by painting with black and white using a soft big brush with low Opacity.

Adding shadow and highlight

Step 7

Here’s the fun part. The map will not be complete until we have a small car on the empty street. You might notice that in our main landscape there’s a parked car. Select and then copy it to a new layer (Control-J). Place it on the street, add a layer mask, and then hide unneeded pixels by painting them with black.

Adding car
Adding car
Car added

6. How to Add the Background

Step 1

We will use a simple background for this map. Activate the Gradient Tool with a standard white to black gradient. Drag from top to bottom until we have this background.

Add white to black gradient for background

Step 2

Let’s add a shadow underneath the map. Control-click the base to make a new selection. Fill it with black, deselect (Control-D), and then apply a Gaussian Blur filter (Filter > Blur > Gaussian Blur) to soften it. Repeat this process a few times with different Radius settings and layer Opacity until we have a realistic floor.

Adding map shadow
Adding map shadow

Step 3

We may need to draw shadow manually by painting black on the canvas using a big soft Brush Tool with low Opacity.

Adding map shadow

Step 4

This grey background is just too dull. Let’s make it more interesting by changing its color to blue. Add a Photo Filter Adjustment Layer above the background and select Cooling Filter.

Adding photo filter adjustment

Conclusion

Now, we have reached the final result. As you can see, there are no complicated tricks in this tutorial. We only used a simple layer mask and a bit of manual drawing. We made cool isometric perspective illustration in Adobe Photoshop.

I believe that it is important to select the best landscape photos—by doing this, we save ourselves from time-consuming photo editing and can focus on working with the map shape. I hope you understand this tutorial and can follow it easily. If you do follow along, let me know your result. I’d love to see it. Thanks.

Final result

Check out some other awesome tutorials with step-by-step cool isometric view illustrations and our articles about this type of design!