What? A front-ender interviewing really smart people about their processes for user research, documenting requirements, and scaling teams around usability? I was a product designer once upon a time and even though it’s been a long time since I’ve flexed that muscle, it was a hoot learning from the guests, which included: Chris Kolb, Kevin Hawkins, and Vicky Carmichael.
The videos are barred from embedding, so I’ll simply link ’em up directly to YouTube:
Small teams have the luxury of being in greater, more intimate contact with customers. Vicky explained how their relatively small size (~11 employees) means that everyone interfaces with customers and that customer issues and requests are handled more immediately.
Large teams have to be mindful of teams forming into individual silos. A silo mentality typically happens when teams scale up in size, resulting in less frequent communication and collaboration. Team dashboards help, as do artifacts from meetings in multiple formats, such as AI-flavored summaries, video recordings, and documented decisions.
Customers may appear to be dumb, but what looks like dumbness is often what happens when humans are faced with a lack of time and context. Solving “dumb” user problems often means coming at the problem in the same bewildered context rather than simply assuming the customer “just doesn’t get it.”
Alt text is one of those things in my muscle memory that pops up anytime I’m working with an image element. The attribute almost writes itself.
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
Or if you use Emmet, that’s autocompleted for you. Don’t forget the alt text! Use it even if there’s no need for it, as an empty string is simply skipped by screen readers. That’s called “nulling” the alternative text and many screen readers simply announce the image file name. Just be sure it’s truly an empty string because even a space gets picked up by some assistive tech, which causes a screen reader to completely skip the image:
Probably is doing a lot of lifting there because not all images are equal when it comes to content and context. Emma Cionca and Tanner Kohler have a fresh study on those situations where you probably don’t need alt. It’s a well-written and researched piece and I’m rounding up some nuggets from it.
What Users Need from Alt Text
It’s the same as what anyone else would need from an image: an easy path to accomplish basic tasks. A product image is a good example of that. Providing a visual smooths the path to purchasing because it’s context about what the item looks like and what to expect when you get it. Not providing an image almost adds friction to the experience if you have to stop and ask customer support basic questions about the size and color of that shirt you want.
So, yes. Describe that image in alt! But maybe “describe” isn’t the best wording because the article moves on to make the next point…
Quit Describing What Images Look Like
The article gets into a common trap that I’m all too guilty of, which is describing an image in a way that I find helpful. Or, as the article says, it’s a lot like I’m telling myself, “I’ll describe it in the alt text so screen-reader users can imagine what they aren’t seeing.”
That’s the wrong way of going about it. Getting back to the example of a product image, the article outlines how a screen reader might approach it:
For example, here’s how a screen-reader user might approach a product page:
Jump between the page headers to get a sense of the page structure.
Explore the details of a specific section with the heading label Product Description.
Encounter an image and wonder “What information that I might have missed elsewhere does this image communicate about the product?”
Interesting! Where I might encounter an image and evaluate it based on the text around it, a screen reader is already questioning what content has been missed around it. This passage is one I need to reflect on (emphasis mine):
Most of the time, screen-reader users don’t wonder what images look like. Instead, they want to know their purpose. (Exceptions to this rule might include websites presenting images, such as artwork, purely for visual enjoyment, or users who could previously see and have lost their sight.)
OK, so how in the heck do we know when an image needs describing? It feels so awkward making what’s ultimately a subjective decision. Even so, the article presents three questions to pose to ourselves to determine the best route.
Is the image repetitive? Is the task-related information in the image also found elsewhere on the page?
Is the image referential? Does the page copy directly reference the image?
Is the image efficient? Could alt text help users more efficiently complete a task?
This is the meat of the article, so I’m gonna break those out.
Is the image repetitive?
Repetitive in the sense that the content around it is already doing a bang-up job painting a picture. If the image is already aptly “described” by content, then perhaps it’s possible to get away with nulling the alt attribute.
This is the figure the article uses to make the point (and, yes, I’m alt-ing it):
The caption for this image describes exactly what the image communicates. Therefore, any alt text for the image will be redundant and a waste of time for screen-reader users. In this case, the actual alt text was the same as the caption. Coming across the same information twice in a row feels even more confusing and unnecessary.
The happy path:
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
But check this out this image about informal/semi-formal table setting showing how it is not described by the text around it (and, no, I’m not alt-ing it):
If I was to describe this image, I might get carried away describing the diagram and all the points outlined in the legend. If I can read all of that, then a screen reader should, too, right? Not exactly. I really appreciate the slew of examples provided in the article. A sampling:
Bread plate and butter knife, located in the top left corner.
Dessert fork, placed horizontally at the top center.
Dessert spoon, placed horizontally at the top center, below the dessert fork.
The second image I dropped in that last section is a good example of a referential image because I directly referenced it in the content preceding it. I nulled the alt attribute because of that. But what I messed up is not making the image recognizable to screen readers. If the alt attribute is null, then the screen reader skips it. But the screen reader should still know it’s there even if it’s aptly described.
The happy path:
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
Remember that a screen reader may announce the image’s file name. So maybe use that as an opportunity to both call out the image and briefly describe it. Again, we want the screen reader to announce the image if we make mention of it in the content around it. Simply skipping it may cause more confusion than clarity.
Is the image efficient?
My mind always goes to performance when I see the word efficient pop up in reference to images. But in this context the article means whether or not the image can help visitors efficiently complete a task.
If the image helps complete a task, say purchasing a product, then yes, the image needs alt text. But if the content surrounding it already does the job then we can leave it null (alt="") or skip it (alt=" ") if there’s no mention of it.
Wrapping up
I put a little demo together with some testing results from a few different screen readers to see how all of that shakes out.
Alt text is one of those things in my muscle memory that pops up anytime I’m working with an image element. The attribute almost writes itself.
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
Or if you use Emmet, that’s autocompleted for you. Don’t forget the alt text! Use it even if there’s no need for it, as an empty string is simply skipped by screen readers. That’s called “nulling” the alternative text and many screen readers simply announce the image file name. Just be sure it’s truly an empty string because even a space gets picked up by some assistive tech, which causes a screen reader to completely skip the image:
Probably is doing a lot of lifting there because not all images are equal when it comes to content and context. Emma Cionca and Tanner Kohler have a fresh study on those situations where you probably don’t need alt. It’s a well-written and researched piece and I’m rounding up some nuggets from it.
What Users Need from Alt Text
It’s the same as what anyone else would need from an image: an easy path to accomplish basic tasks. A product image is a good example of that. Providing a visual smooths the path to purchasing because it’s context about what the item looks like and what to expect when you get it. Not providing an image almost adds friction to the experience if you have to stop and ask customer support basic questions about the size and color of that shirt you want.
So, yes. Describe that image in alt! But maybe “describe” isn’t the best wording because the article moves on to make the next point…
Quit Describing What Images Look Like
The article gets into a common trap that I’m all too guilty of, which is describing an image in a way that I find helpful. Or, as the article says, it’s a lot like I’m telling myself, “I’ll describe it in the alt text so screen-reader users can imagine what they aren’t seeing.”
That’s the wrong way of going about it. Getting back to the example of a product image, the article outlines how a screen reader might approach it:
For example, here’s how a screen-reader user might approach a product page:
Jump between the page headers to get a sense of the page structure.
Explore the details of a specific section with the heading label Product Description.
Encounter an image and wonder “What information that I might have missed elsewhere does this image communicate about the product?”
Interesting! Where I might encounter an image and evaluate it based on the text around it, a screen reader is already questioning what content has been missed around it. This passage is one I need to reflect on (emphasis mine):
Most of the time, screen-reader users don’t wonder what images look like. Instead, they want to know their purpose. (Exceptions to this rule might include websites presenting images, such as artwork, purely for visual enjoyment, or users who could previously see and have lost their sight.)
OK, so how in the heck do we know when an image needs describing? It feels so awkward making what’s ultimately a subjective decision. Even so, the article presents three questions to pose to ourselves to determine the best route.
Is the image repetitive? Is the task-related information in the image also found elsewhere on the page?
Is the image referential? Does the page copy directly reference the image?
Is the image efficient? Could alt text help users more efficiently complete a task?
This is the meat of the article, so I’m gonna break those out.
Is the image repetitive?
Repetitive in the sense that the content around it is already doing a bang-up job painting a picture. If the image is already aptly “described” by content, then perhaps it’s possible to get away with nulling the alt attribute.
This is the figure the article uses to make the point (and, yes, I’m alt-ing it):
The caption for this image describes exactly what the image communicates. Therefore, any alt text for the image will be redundant and a waste of time for screen-reader users. In this case, the actual alt text was the same as the caption. Coming across the same information twice in a row feels even more confusing and unnecessary.
The happy path:
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
But check this out this image about informal/semi-formal table setting showing how it is not described by the text around it (and, no, I’m not alt-ing it):
If I was to describe this image, I might get carried away describing the diagram and all the points outlined in the legend. If I can read all of that, then a screen reader should, too, right? Not exactly. I really appreciate the slew of examples provided in the article. A sampling:
Bread plate and butter knife, located in the top left corner.
Dessert fork, placed horizontally at the top center.
Dessert spoon, placed horizontally at the top center, below the dessert fork.
The second image I dropped in that last section is a good example of a referential image because I directly referenced it in the content preceding it. I nulled the alt attribute because of that. But what I messed up is not making the image recognizable to screen readers. If the alt attribute is null, then the screen reader skips it. But the screen reader should still know it’s there even if it’s aptly described.
The happy path:
<img src="image.jpg" alt="">
Remember that a screen reader may announce the image’s file name. So maybe use that as an opportunity to both call out the image and briefly describe it. Again, we want the screen reader to announce the image if we make mention of it in the content around it. Simply skipping it may cause more confusion than clarity.
Is the image efficient?
My mind always goes to performance when I see the word efficient pop up in reference to images. But in this context the article means whether or not the image can help visitors efficiently complete a task.
If the image helps complete a task, say purchasing a product, then yes, the image needs alt text. But if the content surrounding it already does the job then we can leave it null (alt="") or skip it (alt=" ") if there’s no mention of it.
Wrapping up
I put a little demo together with some testing results from a few different screen readers to see how all of that shakes out.
The mission: Provide a dashboard within the WordPress admin area for browsing Google Analytics data for all your blogs.
The catch? You’ve got about 900 live blogs, spread across about 25 WordPress multisite instances. Some instances have just one blog, others have as many as 250. In other words, what you need is to compress a data set that normally takes a very long time to compile into a single user-friendly screen.
The implementation details are entirely up to you, but the final result should look like this Figma comp:
I want to walk you through my approach and some of the interesting challenges I faced coming up with it, as well as the occasional nitty-gritty detail in between. I’ll cover topics like the WordPress REST API, choosing between a JavaScript or PHP approach, rate/time limits in production web environments, security, custom database design — and even a touch of AI. But first, a little orientation.
Let’s define some terms
We’re about to cover a lot of ground, so it’s worth spending a couple of moments reviewing some key terms we’ll be using throughout this post.
What is WordPress multisite?
WordPress Multisite is a feature of WordPress core — no plugins required — whereby you can run multiple blogs (or websites, or stores, or what have you) from a single WordPress installation. All the blogs share the same WordPress core files, wp-content folder, and MySQL database. However, each blog gets its own folder within wp-content/uploads for its uploaded media, and its own set of database tables for its posts, categories, options, etc. Users can be members of some or all blogs within the multisite installation.
What is WordPress multi-multisite?
It’s just a nickname for managing multiple instances of WordPress multisite. It can get messy to have different customers share one multisite instance, so I prefer to break it up so that each customer has their own multisite, but they can have many blogs within their multisite.
So that’s different from a “Network of Networks”?
It’s apparently possible to run multiple instances of WordPress multisite against the same WordPress core installation. I’ve never looked into this, but I recall hearing about it over the years. I’ve heard the term “Network of Networks” and I like it, but that is not the scenario I’m covering in this article.
Why do you keep saying “blogs”? Do people still blog?
You betcha! And people read them, too. You’re reading one right now. Hence, the need for a robust analytics solution. But this article could just as easily be about any sort of WordPress site. I happen to be dealing with blogs, and the word “blog” is a concise way to express “a subsite within a WordPress multisite instance”.
One more thing: In this article, I’ll use the term dashboard site to refer to the site from which I observe the compiled analytics data. I’ll use the term client sites to refer to the 25 multisites I pull data from.
My implementation
My strategy was to write one WordPress plugin that is installed on all 25 client sites, as well as on the dashboard site. The plugin serves two purposes:
Expose data at API endpoints of the client sites
Scrape the data from the client sites from the dashboard site, cache it in the database, and display it in a dashboard.
The WordPress REST API is the Backbone
The WordPress REST API is my favorite part of WordPress. Out of the box, WordPress exposes default WordPress stuff like posts, authors, comments, media files, etc., via the WordPress REST API. You can see an example of this by navigating to /wp-json from any WordPress site, including CSS-Tricks. Here’s the REST API root for the WordPress Developer Resources site:
The root URL for the WordPress REST API exposes structured JSON data, such as this example from the WordPress Developer Resources website.
What’s so great about this? WordPress ships with everything developers need to extend the WordPress REST API and publish custom endpoints. Exposing data via an API endpoint is a fantastic way to share it with other websites that need to consume it, and that’s exactly what I did:
We don’t need to get into every endpoint’s details, but I want to highlight one thing. First, I provided a function that returns all my endpoints in an array. Next, I wrote a function to loop through the array and register each array member as a WordPress REST API endpoint. Rather than doing both steps in one function, this decoupling allows me to easily retrieve the array of endpoints in other parts of my plugin to do other interesting things with them, such as exposing them to JavaScript. More on that shortly.
Once registered, the custom API endpoints are observable in an ordinary web browser like in the example above, or via purpose-built tools for API work, such as Postman:
PHP vs. JavaScript
I tend to prefer writing applications in PHP whenever possible, as opposed to JavaScript, and executing logic on the server, as nature intended, rather than in the browser. So, what would that look like on this project?
On the dashboard site, upon some event, such as the user clicking a “refresh data” button or perhaps a cron job, the server would make an HTTP request to each of the 25 multisite installs.
Each multisite install would query all of its blogs and consolidate its analytics data into one response per multisite.
Unfortunately, this strategy falls apart for a couple of reasons:
PHP operates synchronously, meaning you wait for one line of code to execute before moving to the next. This means that we’d be waiting for all 25 multisites to respond in series. That’s sub-optimal.
My production environment has a max execution limit of 60 seconds, and some of my multisites contain hundreds of blogs. Querying their analytics data takes a second or two per blog.
Damn. I had no choice but to swallow hard and commit to writing the application logic in JavaScript. Not my favorite, but an eerily elegant solution for this case:
Due to the asynchronous nature of JavaScript, it pings all 25 Multisites at once.
The endpoint on each Multisite returns a list of all the blogs on that Multisite.
The JavaScript compiles that list of blogs and (sort of) pings all 900 at once.
All 900 blogs take about one-to-two seconds to respond concurrently.
Holy cow, it just went from this:
( 1 second per Multisite * 25 installs ) + ( 1 second per blog * 900 blogs ) = roughly 925 seconds to scrape all the data.
To this:
1 second for all the Multisites at once + 1 second for all 900 blogs at once = roughly 2 seconds to scrape all the data.
That is, in theory. In practice, two factors enforce a delay:
Browsers have a limit as to how many concurrent HTTP requests they will allow, both per domain and regardless of domain. I’m having trouble finding documentation on what those limits are. Based on observing the network panel in Chrome while working on this, I’d say it’s about 50-100.
Web hosts have a limit on how many requests they can handle within a given period, both per IP address and overall. I was frequently getting a “429; Too Many Requests” response from my production environment, so I introduced a delay of 150 milliseconds between requests. They still operate concurrently, it’s just that they’re forced to wait 150ms per blog. Maybe “stagger” is a better word than “wait” in this context:
Open the code
async function getBlogsDetails(blogs) {
let promises = [];
// Iterate and set timeouts to stagger requests by 100ms each
blogs.forEach((blog, index) => {
if (typeof blog.url === 'undefined') {
return;
}
let id = blog.id;
const url = blog.url + '/' + blogDetailsEnpointPath + '?uncache=' + getRandomInt();
// Create a promise that resolves after 150ms delay per blog index
const delayedPromise = new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(async () => {
try {
const blogResult = await fetchBlogDetails(url, id);
if( typeof blogResult.urls == 'undefined' ) {
console.error( url, id, blogResult );
} else if( ! blogResult.urls ) {
console.error( blogResult );
} else if( blogResult.urls.length == 0 ) {
console.error( blogResult );
} else {
console.log( blogResult );
}
resolve(blogResult);
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Error fetching details for blog ID ${id}:`, error);
resolve(null); // Resolve with null to handle errors gracefully
}
}, index * 150); // Offset each request by 100ms
});
promises.push(delayedPromise);
});
// Wait for all requests to complete
const blogsResults = await Promise.all(promises);
// Filter out any null results in case of caught errors
return blogsResults.filter(result => result !== null);
}
With these limitations factored in, I found that it takes about 170 seconds to scrape all 900 blogs. This is acceptable because I cache the results, meaning the user only has to wait once at the start of each work session.
The result of all this madness — this incredible barrage of Ajax calls, is just plain fun to watch:
PHP and JavaScript: Connecting the dots
I registered my endpoints in PHP and called them in JavaScript. Merging these two worlds is often an annoying and bug-prone part of any project. To make it as easy as possible, I use wp_localize_script():
When you do, take my endpoint URLs, bundle them up as JSON, and inject them into the HTML document as a global variable for my JavaScript to read. This is leveraging the point I noted earlier where I took care to provide a convenient function for defining the endpoint URLs, which other functions can then invoke without fear of causing any side effects.
Here’s how that ended up looking:
The JSON and its associated JavaScript file, where I pass information from PHP to JavaScript using wp_localize_script().
Auth: Fort Knox or Sandbox?
We need to talk about authentication. To what degree do these endpoints need to be protected by server-side logic? Although exposing analytics data is not nearly as sensitive as, say, user passwords, I’d prefer to keep things reasonably locked up. Also, since some of these endpoints perform a lot of database queries and Google Analytics API calls, it’d be weird to sit here and be vulnerable to weirdos who might want to overload my database or Google Analytics rate limits.
That’s why I registered an application password on each of the 25 client sites. Using an app password in php is quite simple. You can authenticate the HTTP requests just like any basic authentication scheme.
I’m using JavaScript, so I had to localize them first, as described in the previous section. With that in place, I was able to append these credentials when making an Ajax call:
async function fetchBlogsOfInstall(url, id) {
let install = lexblog_network_analytics.installs[id];
let pw = install.pw;
let user = install.user;
// Create a Basic Auth token
let token = btoa(`${user}:${pw}`);
let auth = {
'Authorization': `Basic ${token}`
};
try {
let data = await $.ajax({
url: url,
method: 'GET',
dataType: 'json',
headers: auth
});
return data;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Request failed:', error);
return [];
}
}
That file uses this cool function called btoa() for turning the raw username and password combo into basic authentication.
The part where we say, “Oh Right, CORS.”
Whenever I have a project where Ajax calls are flying around all over the place, working reasonably well in my local environment, I always have a brief moment of panic when I try it on a real website, only to get errors like this:
Oh. Right. CORS. Most reasonably secure websites do not allow other websites to make arbitrary Ajax requests. In this project, I absolutely do need the Dashboard Site to make many Ajax calls to the 25 client sites, so I have to tell the client sites to allow CORS:
<?php
// ...
function __construct() {
add_action( 'rest_api_init', array( $this, 'maybe_add_cors_headers' ), 10 );
}
function maybe_add_cors_headers() {
// Only allow CORS for the endpoints that pertain to this plugin.
if( $this->is_dba() ) {
add_filter( 'rest_pre_serve_request', array( $this, 'send_cors_headers' ), 10, 2 );
}
}
function is_dba() {
$url = $this->get_current_url();
$ep_urls = $this->get_endpoint_urls();
$out = in_array( $url, $ep_urls );
return $out;
}
function send_cors_headers( $served, $result ) {
// Only allow CORS from the dashboard site.
$dashboard_site_url = $this->get_dashboard_site_url();
header( "Access-Control-Allow-Origin: $dashboard_site_url" );
header( 'Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, Authorization' );
header( 'Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, OPTIONS' );
return $served;
}
[...]
}
You’ll note that I’m following the principle of least privilege by taking steps to only allow CORS where it’s necessary.
Auth, Part 2: I’ve been known to auth myself
I authenticated an Ajax call from the dashboard site to the client sites. I registered some logic on all the client sites to allow the request to pass CORS. But then, back on the dashboard site, I had to get that response from the browser to the server.
The answer, again, was to make an Ajax call to the WordPress REST API endpoint for storing the data. But since this was an actual database write, not merely a read, it was more important than ever to authenticate. I did this by requiring that the current user be logged into WordPress and possess sufficient privileges. But how would the browser know about this?
In PHP, when registering our endpoints, we provide a permissions callback to make sure the current user is an admin:
JavaScript can use this — it’s able to identify the current user — because, once again, that data is localized. The current user is represented by their nonce:
async function insertBlog( data ) {
let url = lexblog_network_analytics.endpoint_urls.insert_blog;
try {
await $.ajax({
url: url,
method: 'POST',
dataType: 'json',
data: data,
headers: {
'X-WP-Nonce': getNonce()
}
});
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to store blogs:', error);
}
}
function getNonce() {
if( typeof wpApiSettings.nonce == 'undefined' ) { return false; }
return wpApiSettings.nonce;
}
The wpApiSettings.nonce global variable is automatically present in all WordPress admin screens. I didn’t have to localize that. WordPress core did it for me.
Cache is King
Compressing the Google Analytics data from 900 domains into a three-minute loading .gif is decent, but it would be totally unacceptable to have to wait for that long multiple times per work session. Therefore I cache the results of all 25 client sites in the database of the dashboard site.
I’ve written before about using the WordPress Transients API for caching data, and I could have used it on this project. However, something about the tremendous volume of data and the complexity implied within the Figma design made me consider a different approach. I like the saying, “The wider the base, the higher the peak,” and it applies here. Given that the user needs to query and sort the data by date, author, and metadata, I think stashing everything into a single database cell — which is what a transient is — would feel a little claustrophobic. Instead, I dialed up E.F. Codd and used a relational database model via custom tables:
In the Dashboard Site, I created seven custom database tables, including one relational table, to cache the data from the 25 client sites, as shown in the image.
It’s been years since I’ve paged through Larry Ullman’s career-defining (as in, my career) books on database design, but I came into this project with a general idea of what a good architecture would look like. As for the specific details — things like column types — I foresaw a lot of Stack Overflow time in my future. Fortunately, LLMs love MySQL and I was able to scaffold out my requirements using DocBlocks and let Sam Altman fill in the blanks:
Open the code
<?php
/**
* Provides the SQL code for creating the Blogs table. It has columns for:
* - ID: The ID for the blog. This should just autoincrement and is the primary key.
* - name: The name of the blog. Required.
* - slug: A machine-friendly version of the blog name. Required.
* - url: The url of the blog. Required.
* - mapped_domain: The vanity domain name of the blog. Optional.
* - install: The name of the Multisite install where this blog was scraped from. Required.
* - registered: The date on which this blog began publishing posts. Optional.
* - firm_id: The ID of the firm that publishes this blog. This will be used as a foreign key to relate to the Firms table. Optional.
* - practice_area_id: The ID of the firm that publishes this blog. This will be used as a foreign key to relate to the PracticeAreas table. Optional.
* - amlaw: Either a 0 or a 1, to indicate if the blog comes from an AmLaw firm. Required.
* - subscriber_count: The number of email subscribers for this blog. Optional.
* - day_view_count: The number of views for this blog today. Optional.
* - week_view_count: The number of views for this blog this week. Optional.
* - month_view_count: The number of views for this blog this month. Optional.
* - year_view_count: The number of views for this blog this year. Optional.
*
* @return string The SQL for generating the blogs table.
*/
function get_blogs_table_sql() {
$slug = 'blogs';
$out = "CREATE TABLE {$this->get_prefix()}_$slug (
id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
slug VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
url VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL UNIQUE, /* adding unique constraint */
mapped_domain VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,
install VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
registered DATE DEFAULT NULL,
firm_id BIGINT,
practice_area_id BIGINT,
amlaw TINYINT NOT NULL,
subscriber_count BIGINT,
day_view_count BIGINT,
week_view_count BIGINT,
month_view_count BIGINT,
year_view_count BIGINT,
PRIMARY KEY (id),
FOREIGN KEY (firm_id) REFERENCES {$this->get_prefix()}_firms(id),
FOREIGN KEY (practice_area_id) REFERENCES {$this->get_prefix()}_practice_areas(id)
) DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;";
return $out;
}
In that file, I quickly wrote a DocBlock for each function, and let the OpenAI playground spit out the SQL. I tested the result and suggested some rigorous type-checking for values that should always be formatted as numbers or dates, but that was the only adjustment I had to make. I think that’s the correct use of AI at this moment: You come in with a strong idea of what the result should be, AI fills in the details, and you debate with it until the details reflect what you mostly already knew.
How it’s going
I’ve implemented most of the user stories now. Certainly enough to release an MVP and begin gathering whatever insights this data might have for us:
It’s working!
One interesting data point thus far: Although all the blogs are on the topic of legal matters (they are lawyer blogs, after all), blogs that cover topics with a more general appeal seem to drive more traffic. Blogs about the law as it pertains to food, cruise ships, germs, and cannabis, for example. Furthermore, the largest law firms on our network don’t seem to have much of a foothold there. Smaller firms are doing a better job of connecting with a wider audience. I’m positive that other insights will emerge as we work more deeply with this.
Regrets? I’ve had a few.
This project probably would have been a nice opportunity to apply a modern JavaScript framework, or just no framework at all. I like React and I can imagine how cool it would be to have this application be driven by the various changes in state rather than… drumroll… a couple thousand lines of jQuery!
I like jQuery’s ajax() method, and I like the jQueryUI autocomplete component. Also, there’s less of a performance concern here than on a public-facing front-end. Since this screen is in the WordPress admin area, I’m not concerned about Google admonishing me for using an extra library. And I’m just faster with jQuery. Use whatever you want.
I also think it would be interesting to put AWS to work here and see what could be done through Lambda functions. Maybe I could get Lambda to make all 25 plus 900 requests concurrently with no worries about browser limitations. Heck, maybe I could get it to cycle through IP addresses and sidestep the 429 rate limit as well.
And what about cron? Cron could do a lot of work for us here. It could compile the data on each of the 25 client sites ahead of time, meaning that the initial three-minute refresh time goes away. Writing an application in cron, initially, I think is fine. Coming back six months later to debug something is another matter. Not my favorite. I might revisit this later on, but for now, the cron-free implementation meets the MVP goal.
I have not provided a line-by-line tutorial here, or even a working repo for you to download, and that level of detail was never my intention. I wanted to share high-level strategy decisions that might be of interest to fellow Multi-Multisite people. Have you faced a similar challenge? I’d love to hear about it in the comments!
The mission: Provide a dashboard within the WordPress admin area for browsing Google Analytics data for all your blogs.
The catch? You’ve got about 900 live blogs, spread across about 25 WordPress multisite instances. Some instances have just one blog, others have as many as 250. In other words, what you need is to compress a data set that normally takes a very long time to compile into a single user-friendly screen.
The implementation details are entirely up to you, but the final result should look like this Figma comp:
I want to walk you through my approach and some of the interesting challenges I faced coming up with it, as well as the occasional nitty-gritty detail in between. I’ll cover topics like the WordPress REST API, choosing between a JavaScript or PHP approach, rate/time limits in production web environments, security, custom database design — and even a touch of AI. But first, a little orientation.
Let’s define some terms
We’re about to cover a lot of ground, so it’s worth spending a couple of moments reviewing some key terms we’ll be using throughout this post.
What is WordPress multisite?
WordPress Multisite is a feature of WordPress core — no plugins required — whereby you can run multiple blogs (or websites, or stores, or what have you) from a single WordPress installation. All the blogs share the same WordPress core files, wp-content folder, and MySQL database. However, each blog gets its own folder within wp-content/uploads for its uploaded media, and its own set of database tables for its posts, categories, options, etc. Users can be members of some or all blogs within the multisite installation.
What is WordPress multi-multisite?
It’s just a nickname for managing multiple instances of WordPress multisite. It can get messy to have different customers share one multisite instance, so I prefer to break it up so that each customer has their own multisite, but they can have many blogs within their multisite.
So that’s different from a “Network of Networks”?
It’s apparently possible to run multiple instances of WordPress multisite against the same WordPress core installation. I’ve never looked into this, but I recall hearing about it over the years. I’ve heard the term “Network of Networks” and I like it, but that is not the scenario I’m covering in this article.
Why do you keep saying “blogs”? Do people still blog?
You betcha! And people read them, too. You’re reading one right now. Hence, the need for a robust analytics solution. But this article could just as easily be about any sort of WordPress site. I happen to be dealing with blogs, and the word “blog” is a concise way to express “a subsite within a WordPress multisite instance”.
One more thing: In this article, I’ll use the term dashboard site to refer to the site from which I observe the compiled analytics data. I’ll use the term client sites to refer to the 25 multisites I pull data from.
My implementation
My strategy was to write one WordPress plugin that is installed on all 25 client sites, as well as on the dashboard site. The plugin serves two purposes:
Expose data at API endpoints of the client sites
Scrape the data from the client sites from the dashboard site, cache it in the database, and display it in a dashboard.
The WordPress REST API is the Backbone
The WordPress REST API is my favorite part of WordPress. Out of the box, WordPress exposes default WordPress stuff like posts, authors, comments, media files, etc., via the WordPress REST API. You can see an example of this by navigating to /wp-json from any WordPress site, including CSS-Tricks. Here’s the REST API root for the WordPress Developer Resources site:
The root URL for the WordPress REST API exposes structured JSON data, such as this example from the WordPress Developer Resources website.
What’s so great about this? WordPress ships with everything developers need to extend the WordPress REST API and publish custom endpoints. Exposing data via an API endpoint is a fantastic way to share it with other websites that need to consume it, and that’s exactly what I did:
We don’t need to get into every endpoint’s details, but I want to highlight one thing. First, I provided a function that returns all my endpoints in an array. Next, I wrote a function to loop through the array and register each array member as a WordPress REST API endpoint. Rather than doing both steps in one function, this decoupling allows me to easily retrieve the array of endpoints in other parts of my plugin to do other interesting things with them, such as exposing them to JavaScript. More on that shortly.
Once registered, the custom API endpoints are observable in an ordinary web browser like in the example above, or via purpose-built tools for API work, such as Postman:
PHP vs. JavaScript
I tend to prefer writing applications in PHP whenever possible, as opposed to JavaScript, and executing logic on the server, as nature intended, rather than in the browser. So, what would that look like on this project?
On the dashboard site, upon some event, such as the user clicking a “refresh data” button or perhaps a cron job, the server would make an HTTP request to each of the 25 multisite installs.
Each multisite install would query all of its blogs and consolidate its analytics data into one response per multisite.
Unfortunately, this strategy falls apart for a couple of reasons:
PHP operates synchronously, meaning you wait for one line of code to execute before moving to the next. This means that we’d be waiting for all 25 multisites to respond in series. That’s sub-optimal.
My production environment has a max execution limit of 60 seconds, and some of my multisites contain hundreds of blogs. Querying their analytics data takes a second or two per blog.
Damn. I had no choice but to swallow hard and commit to writing the application logic in JavaScript. Not my favorite, but an eerily elegant solution for this case:
Due to the asynchronous nature of JavaScript, it pings all 25 Multisites at once.
The endpoint on each Multisite returns a list of all the blogs on that Multisite.
The JavaScript compiles that list of blogs and (sort of) pings all 900 at once.
All 900 blogs take about one-to-two seconds to respond concurrently.
Holy cow, it just went from this:
( 1 second per Multisite * 25 installs ) + ( 1 second per blog * 900 blogs ) = roughly 925 seconds to scrape all the data.
To this:
1 second for all the Multisites at once + 1 second for all 900 blogs at once = roughly 2 seconds to scrape all the data.
That is, in theory. In practice, two factors enforce a delay:
Browsers have a limit as to how many concurrent HTTP requests they will allow, both per domain and regardless of domain. I’m having trouble finding documentation on what those limits are. Based on observing the network panel in Chrome while working on this, I’d say it’s about 50-100.
Web hosts have a limit on how many requests they can handle within a given period, both per IP address and overall. I was frequently getting a “429; Too Many Requests” response from my production environment, so I introduced a delay of 150 milliseconds between requests. They still operate concurrently, it’s just that they’re forced to wait 150ms per blog. Maybe “stagger” is a better word than “wait” in this context:
Open the code
async function getBlogsDetails(blogs) {
let promises = [];
// Iterate and set timeouts to stagger requests by 100ms each
blogs.forEach((blog, index) => {
if (typeof blog.url === 'undefined') {
return;
}
let id = blog.id;
const url = blog.url + '/' + blogDetailsEnpointPath + '?uncache=' + getRandomInt();
// Create a promise that resolves after 150ms delay per blog index
const delayedPromise = new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(async () => {
try {
const blogResult = await fetchBlogDetails(url, id);
if( typeof blogResult.urls == 'undefined' ) {
console.error( url, id, blogResult );
} else if( ! blogResult.urls ) {
console.error( blogResult );
} else if( blogResult.urls.length == 0 ) {
console.error( blogResult );
} else {
console.log( blogResult );
}
resolve(blogResult);
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Error fetching details for blog ID ${id}:`, error);
resolve(null); // Resolve with null to handle errors gracefully
}
}, index * 150); // Offset each request by 100ms
});
promises.push(delayedPromise);
});
// Wait for all requests to complete
const blogsResults = await Promise.all(promises);
// Filter out any null results in case of caught errors
return blogsResults.filter(result => result !== null);
}
With these limitations factored in, I found that it takes about 170 seconds to scrape all 900 blogs. This is acceptable because I cache the results, meaning the user only has to wait once at the start of each work session.
The result of all this madness — this incredible barrage of Ajax calls, is just plain fun to watch:
PHP and JavaScript: Connecting the dots
I registered my endpoints in PHP and called them in JavaScript. Merging these two worlds is often an annoying and bug-prone part of any project. To make it as easy as possible, I use wp_localize_script():
When you do, take my endpoint URLs, bundle them up as JSON, and inject them into the HTML document as a global variable for my JavaScript to read. This is leveraging the point I noted earlier where I took care to provide a convenient function for defining the endpoint URLs, which other functions can then invoke without fear of causing any side effects.
Here’s how that ended up looking:
The JSON and its associated JavaScript file, where I pass information from PHP to JavaScript using wp_localize_script().
Auth: Fort Knox or Sandbox?
We need to talk about authentication. To what degree do these endpoints need to be protected by server-side logic? Although exposing analytics data is not nearly as sensitive as, say, user passwords, I’d prefer to keep things reasonably locked up. Also, since some of these endpoints perform a lot of database queries and Google Analytics API calls, it’d be weird to sit here and be vulnerable to weirdos who might want to overload my database or Google Analytics rate limits.
That’s why I registered an application password on each of the 25 client sites. Using an app password in php is quite simple. You can authenticate the HTTP requests just like any basic authentication scheme.
I’m using JavaScript, so I had to localize them first, as described in the previous section. With that in place, I was able to append these credentials when making an Ajax call:
async function fetchBlogsOfInstall(url, id) {
let install = lexblog_network_analytics.installs[id];
let pw = install.pw;
let user = install.user;
// Create a Basic Auth token
let token = btoa(`${user}:${pw}`);
let auth = {
'Authorization': `Basic ${token}`
};
try {
let data = await $.ajax({
url: url,
method: 'GET',
dataType: 'json',
headers: auth
});
return data;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Request failed:', error);
return [];
}
}
That file uses this cool function called btoa() for turning the raw username and password combo into basic authentication.
The part where we say, “Oh Right, CORS.”
Whenever I have a project where Ajax calls are flying around all over the place, working reasonably well in my local environment, I always have a brief moment of panic when I try it on a real website, only to get errors like this:
Oh. Right. CORS. Most reasonably secure websites do not allow other websites to make arbitrary Ajax requests. In this project, I absolutely do need the Dashboard Site to make many Ajax calls to the 25 client sites, so I have to tell the client sites to allow CORS:
<?php
// ...
function __construct() {
add_action( 'rest_api_init', array( $this, 'maybe_add_cors_headers' ), 10 );
}
function maybe_add_cors_headers() {
// Only allow CORS for the endpoints that pertain to this plugin.
if( $this->is_dba() ) {
add_filter( 'rest_pre_serve_request', array( $this, 'send_cors_headers' ), 10, 2 );
}
}
function is_dba() {
$url = $this->get_current_url();
$ep_urls = $this->get_endpoint_urls();
$out = in_array( $url, $ep_urls );
return $out;
}
function send_cors_headers( $served, $result ) {
// Only allow CORS from the dashboard site.
$dashboard_site_url = $this->get_dashboard_site_url();
header( "Access-Control-Allow-Origin: $dashboard_site_url" );
header( 'Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, Authorization' );
header( 'Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, OPTIONS' );
return $served;
}
[...]
}
You’ll note that I’m following the principle of least privilege by taking steps to only allow CORS where it’s necessary.
Auth, Part 2: I’ve been known to auth myself
I authenticated an Ajax call from the dashboard site to the client sites. I registered some logic on all the client sites to allow the request to pass CORS. But then, back on the dashboard site, I had to get that response from the browser to the server.
The answer, again, was to make an Ajax call to the WordPress REST API endpoint for storing the data. But since this was an actual database write, not merely a read, it was more important than ever to authenticate. I did this by requiring that the current user be logged into WordPress and possess sufficient privileges. But how would the browser know about this?
In PHP, when registering our endpoints, we provide a permissions callback to make sure the current user is an admin:
JavaScript can use this — it’s able to identify the current user — because, once again, that data is localized. The current user is represented by their nonce:
async function insertBlog( data ) {
let url = lexblog_network_analytics.endpoint_urls.insert_blog;
try {
await $.ajax({
url: url,
method: 'POST',
dataType: 'json',
data: data,
headers: {
'X-WP-Nonce': getNonce()
}
});
} catch (error) {
console.error('Failed to store blogs:', error);
}
}
function getNonce() {
if( typeof wpApiSettings.nonce == 'undefined' ) { return false; }
return wpApiSettings.nonce;
}
The wpApiSettings.nonce global variable is automatically present in all WordPress admin screens. I didn’t have to localize that. WordPress core did it for me.
Cache is King
Compressing the Google Analytics data from 900 domains into a three-minute loading .gif is decent, but it would be totally unacceptable to have to wait for that long multiple times per work session. Therefore I cache the results of all 25 client sites in the database of the dashboard site.
I’ve written before about using the WordPress Transients API for caching data, and I could have used it on this project. However, something about the tremendous volume of data and the complexity implied within the Figma design made me consider a different approach. I like the saying, “The wider the base, the higher the peak,” and it applies here. Given that the user needs to query and sort the data by date, author, and metadata, I think stashing everything into a single database cell — which is what a transient is — would feel a little claustrophobic. Instead, I dialed up E.F. Codd and used a relational database model via custom tables:
In the Dashboard Site, I created seven custom database tables, including one relational table, to cache the data from the 25 client sites, as shown in the image.
It’s been years since I’ve paged through Larry Ullman’s career-defining (as in, my career) books on database design, but I came into this project with a general idea of what a good architecture would look like. As for the specific details — things like column types — I foresaw a lot of Stack Overflow time in my future. Fortunately, LLMs love MySQL and I was able to scaffold out my requirements using DocBlocks and let Sam Altman fill in the blanks:
Open the code
<?php
/**
* Provides the SQL code for creating the Blogs table. It has columns for:
* - ID: The ID for the blog. This should just autoincrement and is the primary key.
* - name: The name of the blog. Required.
* - slug: A machine-friendly version of the blog name. Required.
* - url: The url of the blog. Required.
* - mapped_domain: The vanity domain name of the blog. Optional.
* - install: The name of the Multisite install where this blog was scraped from. Required.
* - registered: The date on which this blog began publishing posts. Optional.
* - firm_id: The ID of the firm that publishes this blog. This will be used as a foreign key to relate to the Firms table. Optional.
* - practice_area_id: The ID of the firm that publishes this blog. This will be used as a foreign key to relate to the PracticeAreas table. Optional.
* - amlaw: Either a 0 or a 1, to indicate if the blog comes from an AmLaw firm. Required.
* - subscriber_count: The number of email subscribers for this blog. Optional.
* - day_view_count: The number of views for this blog today. Optional.
* - week_view_count: The number of views for this blog this week. Optional.
* - month_view_count: The number of views for this blog this month. Optional.
* - year_view_count: The number of views for this blog this year. Optional.
*
* @return string The SQL for generating the blogs table.
*/
function get_blogs_table_sql() {
$slug = 'blogs';
$out = "CREATE TABLE {$this->get_prefix()}_$slug (
id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
slug VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
url VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL UNIQUE, /* adding unique constraint */
mapped_domain VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE,
install VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
registered DATE DEFAULT NULL,
firm_id BIGINT,
practice_area_id BIGINT,
amlaw TINYINT NOT NULL,
subscriber_count BIGINT,
day_view_count BIGINT,
week_view_count BIGINT,
month_view_count BIGINT,
year_view_count BIGINT,
PRIMARY KEY (id),
FOREIGN KEY (firm_id) REFERENCES {$this->get_prefix()}_firms(id),
FOREIGN KEY (practice_area_id) REFERENCES {$this->get_prefix()}_practice_areas(id)
) DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4;";
return $out;
}
In that file, I quickly wrote a DocBlock for each function, and let the OpenAI playground spit out the SQL. I tested the result and suggested some rigorous type-checking for values that should always be formatted as numbers or dates, but that was the only adjustment I had to make. I think that’s the correct use of AI at this moment: You come in with a strong idea of what the result should be, AI fills in the details, and you debate with it until the details reflect what you mostly already knew.
How it’s going
I’ve implemented most of the user stories now. Certainly enough to release an MVP and begin gathering whatever insights this data might have for us:
It’s working!
One interesting data point thus far: Although all the blogs are on the topic of legal matters (they are lawyer blogs, after all), blogs that cover topics with a more general appeal seem to drive more traffic. Blogs about the law as it pertains to food, cruise ships, germs, and cannabis, for example. Furthermore, the largest law firms on our network don’t seem to have much of a foothold there. Smaller firms are doing a better job of connecting with a wider audience. I’m positive that other insights will emerge as we work more deeply with this.
Regrets? I’ve had a few.
This project probably would have been a nice opportunity to apply a modern JavaScript framework, or just no framework at all. I like React and I can imagine how cool it would be to have this application be driven by the various changes in state rather than… drumroll… a couple thousand lines of jQuery!
I like jQuery’s ajax() method, and I like the jQueryUI autocomplete component. Also, there’s less of a performance concern here than on a public-facing front-end. Since this screen is in the WordPress admin area, I’m not concerned about Google admonishing me for using an extra library. And I’m just faster with jQuery. Use whatever you want.
I also think it would be interesting to put AWS to work here and see what could be done through Lambda functions. Maybe I could get Lambda to make all 25 plus 900 requests concurrently with no worries about browser limitations. Heck, maybe I could get it to cycle through IP addresses and sidestep the 429 rate limit as well.
And what about cron? Cron could do a lot of work for us here. It could compile the data on each of the 25 client sites ahead of time, meaning that the initial three-minute refresh time goes away. Writing an application in cron, initially, I think is fine. Coming back six months later to debug something is another matter. Not my favorite. I might revisit this later on, but for now, the cron-free implementation meets the MVP goal.
I have not provided a line-by-line tutorial here, or even a working repo for you to download, and that level of detail was never my intention. I wanted to share high-level strategy decisions that might be of interest to fellow Multi-Multisite people. Have you faced a similar challenge? I’d love to hear about it in the comments!
Imagine you have a web component that can show lots of different content. It will likely have a slot somewhere where other components can be injected. The parent component also has its own styles unrelated to the styles of the content components it may hold.
This makes a challenging situation: how can we prevent the parent component styles from leaking inwards?
This isn’t a new problem — Nicole Sullivan described it way back in 2011! The main problem is writing CSS so that it doesn’t affect the content, and she accurately coined it as donut scoping.
“We need a way of saying, not only where scope starts, but where it ends. Thus, the scope donut”.
Even if donut scoping is an ancient issue in web years, if you do a quick search on “CSS Donut Scope” in your search engine of choice, you may notice two things:
Most of them talk about the still recent @scope at-rule.
Almost every result is from 2021 onwards.
We get similar results even with a clever “CSS Donut Scope –@scope” query, and going year by year doesn’t seem to bring anything new to the donut scope table. It seems like donut scopes stayed at the back of our minds as just another headache of the ol’ CSS global scope until @scope.
And (spoiler!), while the @scope at-rule brings an easier path for donut scoping, I feel there must have been more attempted solutions over the years. We will venture through each of them, making a final stop at today’s solution, @scope. It’s a nice exercise in CSS history!
Take, for example, the following game screen. We have a .parent element with a tab set and a .content slot, in which an .inventory component is injected. If we change the .parent color, then so does the color inside .content.
CodePen Embed Fallback
How can we stop this from happening? I want to prevent the text inside of .content from inheriting the .parent‘s color.
Just ignore it!
The first solution is no solution at all! This may be the most-used approach since most developers can live their lives without the joys of donut scoping (crazy, right?). Let’s be more tangible here, it isn’t just blatantly ignoring it, but rather accepting CSS’s global scope and writing styles with that in mind. Back to our first example, we assume we can’t stop the parent’s styles from leaking inwards to the content component, so we write our parent’s styles with less specificity, so they can be overridden by the content styles.
While this approach is sufficient for now, managing styles just by their specificity as a project grows larger becomes tedious, at best, and chaotic at worst. Components may behave differently depending on where they are slotted and changing our CSS or HTML can break other styles in unexpected ways.
Two CSS properties walk into a bar. A barstool in a completely different bar falls over.
Thomas Fuchs
You can see how in this small example we have to override the styles twice:
Shallow donuts scopes with :not()
Our goal then it’s to only scope the .parent, leaving out whatever may be inserted into the .content slot. So, not the .content but the rest of .parent… not the .content… :not()! We can use the :not() selector to scope only the direct descendants of .parent that aren’t .content.
This way the .content styles won’t be bothered by the styles defined in their .parent:
CodePen Embed Fallback
You can see an immense difference when we open the DevTools for each example:
As good as an improvement, the last example has a shallow reach. So, if there were another slot nested deeper in, we wouldn’t be able to reach it unless we know beforehand where it is going to be slotted.
CodePen Embed Fallback
This is because we are using the direct descendant selector (>), but I couldn’t find a way to make it work without it. Even using a combination of complex selectors inside :not() doesn’t seem to lead anywhere useful. For example, back in 2021, Dr. Lea Verou mentioned donut scoping with :not() using the following selector cocktail:
However, this snippet appears to match the .container/.parent class instead of its descendants, and it’s noted that it still would be shallow donut scoping:
TIL that all modern browsers now support complex selectors in :not()! 😍
So you can do things like: – .foo :not(.foo .foo *) to match things inside one .foo wrapper but not two – .container :not(.content *) to get simple (shallow) “donut scope”
So our last step for donut scoping completion is being able to go beyond one DOM layer. Luckily, last year we were gifted the @scope at-rule (you can read more about it in its Almanac entry). In a nutshell, it lets us select a subtree in the DOM where our styles will be scoped, so no more global scope!
@scope (.parent) {
/* Styles written here will only affect .parent */
}
What’s better, we can leave slots inside the subtree we selected (usually called the scope root). In this case, we would want to style the .parent element without scoping .content:
@scope (.parent) to (.content) {
/* Styles written here will only affect .parent but skip .content*/
}
And what’s better, it detects every .content element inside .parent, no matter how nested it may be. So we don’t need to worry about where we are writing our slots. In the last example, we could instead write the following style to change the text color of the element in .parent without touching .content:
body {
color: blue;
}
@scope (.parent) to (.content) {
h2,
p,
span,
a {
color: orange;
}
}
While it may seem inconvenient to list all the elements we are going to change, we can’t use something like the universal selector (*) since it would mess up the scoping of nested slots. In this example, it would leave the nested .content out of scope, but not its container. Since the color property inherits, the nested .content would change colors regardless!
And voilà! Both .content slots are inside our scoped donut holes:
CodePen Embed Fallback
Shallow scoping is still possible with this method, we would just have to rewrite our slot selector so that only direct .content descendants of .parent are left out of the scope. However, we have to use the :scope selector, which refers back to the scoping root, or .parent in this case:
We can use the universal selector in this instance since it’s shallow scoping.
CodePen Embed Fallback
Conclusion
Donut scoping, a wannabe feature coined back in 2011 has finally been brought to life in the year 2024. It’s still baffling how it appeared to sit in the back of our minds until recently, as just another consequence of CSS Global Scope, while it had so many quirks by itself. It would be unfair, however, to say that it went under everyone’s radars since the CSSWG (the people behind writing the spec for new CSS features) clearly had the intention to address it when writing the spec for the @scope at-rule.
Whatever it may be, I am grateful we can have true donut scoping in our CSS. To some degree, we still have to wait for Firefox to support it. 😉
This browser support data is from Caniuse, which has more detail. A number indicates that browser supports the feature at that version and up.
The PopoverAPI and <dialog> element are two of my favorite new platform features. In fact, I recently [wrote a detailed overview of their use cases] and the sorts of things you can do with them, even learning a few tricks in the process that I couldn’t find documented anywhere else.
I’ll admit that one thing that I really dislike about popovers and dialogs is that they could’ve easily been combined into a single API. They cover different use cases (notably, dialogs are typically modal) but are quite similar in practice, and yet their implementations are different.
Well, web browsers are now experimenting with two HTML attributes — technically, they’re called “invoker commands” — that are designed to invoke popovers, dialogs, and further down the line, all kinds of actions without writing JavaScript. Although, if you do reach for JavaScript, the new attributes — command and commandfor — come with some new events that we can listen for.
Invoker commands? I’m sure you have questions, so let’s dive in.
We’re in experimental territory
Before we get into the weeds, we’re dealing with experimental features. To use invoker commands today in November 2024 you’ll need Chrome Canary 134+ with the enable-experimental-web-platform-features flag set to Enabled, Firefox Nightly 135+ with the dom.element.invokers.enabled flag set to true, or Safari Technology Preview with the InvokerAttributesEnabled flag set to true.
I’m optimistic we’ll get baseline coverage for command and commandfor in due time considering how nicely they abstract the kind of work that currently takes a hefty amount of scripting.
Basic command and commandfor usage
First, you’ll need a <button> or a button-esque <input> along the lines of <input type="button"> or <input type="reset">. Next, tack on the command attribute. The command value should be the command name that you want the button to invoke (e.g., show-modal). After that, drop the commandfor attribute in there referencing the dialog or popover you’re targeting by its id.
In this example, I have a <button> element with a command attribute set to show-modal and a commandfor attribute set to dialogA, which matches the id of a <dialog> element we’re targeting:
Let’s get into the possible values for these invoker commands and dissect what they’re doing.
Looking closer at the attribute values
CodePen Embed Fallback
The show-modal value is the command that I just showed you in that last example. Specifically, it’s the HTML-invoked equivalent of JavaScript’s showModal() method.
There isn’t ashow command to invoke show() for creating non-modal dialogs. I’ve mentioned before that non-modal dialogs are redundant now that we have the Popover API, especially since popovers have ::backdrops and other dialog-like features. My bold prediction is that non-modal dialogs will be quietly phased out over time.
The close command is the HTML-invoked equivalent of JavaScript’s close() method used for closing the dialog. You probably could have guessed that based on the name alone!
…invokes togglePopover(), and is the same thing as:
<button popovertargetaction="toggle" popovertarget="id">
<!-- or <button popovertarget="id">, since ‘toggle’ is the default action anyway. -->
I know all of this can be tough to organize in your mind’s eye, so perhaps a table will help tie things together:
command
Invokes
popovertargetaction equivalent
show-popover
showPopover()
show
hide-popover
hidePopover()
hide
toggle-popover
togglePopover()
toggle
So… yeah, popovers can already be invoked using HTML attributes, making command and commandfor not all that useful in this context. But like I said, invoker commands also come with some useful JavaScript stuff, so let’s dive into all of that.
Listening to commands with JavaScript
Invoker commands dispatch a command event to the target whenever their source button is clicked on, which we can listen for and work with in JavaScript. This isn’t required for a <dialog> element’s close event, or a popover attribute’s toggle or beforetoggle event, because we can already listen for those, right?
For example, the Dialog API doesn’t dispatch an event when a <dialog> is shown. So, let’s use invoker commands to listen for the command event instead, and then read event.command to take the appropriate action.
// Select all dialogs
const dialogs = document.querySelectorAll("dialog");
// Loop all dialogs
dialogs.forEach(dialog => {
// Listen for close (as normal)
dialog.addEventListener("close", () => {
// Dialog was closed
});
// Listen for command
dialog.addEventListener("command", event => {
// If command is show-modal
if (event.command == "show-modal") {
// Dialog was shown (modally)
}
// Another way to listen for close
else if (event.command == "close") {
// Dialog was closed
}
});
});
So invoker commands give us additional ways to work with dialogs and popovers, and in some scenarios, they’ll be less verbose. In other scenarios though, they’ll be more verbose. Your approach should depend on what you need your dialogs and popovers to do.
For the sake of completeness, here’s an example for popovers, even though it’s largely the same:
// Select all popovers
const popovers = document.querySelectorAll("[popover]");
// Loop all popovers
popovers.forEach(popover => {
// Listen for command
popover.addEventListener("command", event => {
// If command is show-popover
if (event.command == "show-popover") {
// Popover was shown
}
// If command is hide-popover
else if (event.command == "hide-popover") {
// Popover was hidden
}
// If command is toggle-popover
else if (event.command == "toggle-popover") {
// Popover was toggled
}
});
});
Being able to listen for show-popover and hide-popover is useful as we otherwise have to write a sort of “if opened, do this, else do that” logic from within a toggle or beforetoggle event listener or toggle-popover conditional. But <dialog> elements? Yeah, those benefit more from the command and commandfor attributes than they do from this command JavaScript event.
Another thing that’s available to us via JavaScript is event.source, which is the button that invokes the popover or <dialog>:
if (event.command == "toggle-popover") {
// Toggle the invoker’s class
event.source.classList.toggle("active");
}
You can also set the command and commandfor attributes using JavaScript:
The command attribute also accepts custom commands prefixed with two dashes (--). I suppose this makes them like CSS custom properties but for JavaScript events and event handler HTML attributes. The latter observation is maybe a bit (or definitely a lot) controversial since using event handler HTML attributes is considered bad practice. But let’s take a look at that anyway, shall we?
Custom commands look like this:
<button command="--spin-me-a-bit" commandfor="record">Spin me a bit</button>
<button command="--spin-me-a-lot" commandfor="record">Spin me a lot</button>
<button command="--spin-me-right-round" commandfor="record">Spin me right round</button>
const record = document.querySelector("#record");
record.addEventListener("command", event => {
if (event.command == "--spin-me-a-bit") {
record.style.rotate = "90deg";
} else if (event.command == "--spin-me-a-lot") {
record.style.rotate = "180deg";
} else if (event.command == "--spin-me-right-round") {
record.style.rotate = "360deg";
}
});
event.command must match the string with the dashed (--) prefix.
Are popover and <dialog> the only features that support invoker commands?
According to Open UI, invokers targeting additional elements such as <details> were deferred from the initial release. I think this is because HTML-invoked dialogs and an API that unifies dialogs and popovers is a must-have, whereas other commands (even custom commands) feel more like a nice-to-have deal.
However, based on experimentation (I couldn’t help myself!) web browsers have actually implemented additional invokers to varying degrees. For example, <details> commands work as expected whereas <select> commands match event.command (e.g., show-picker) but fail to actually invoke the method (showPicker()). I missed all of this at first because MDN only mentions dialog and popover.
Open UI also alludes to commands for <input type="file">, <input type="number">, <video>, <audio>, and fullscreen-related methods, but I don’t think that anything is certain at this point.
So, what would be the benefits of invoker commands?
Well, a whole lot less JavaScript for one, especially if more invoker commands are implemented over time. Additionally, we can listen for these commands almost as if they were JavaScript events. But if nothing else, invoker commands simply provide more ways to interact with APIs such as the Dialog and Popover APIs. In a nutshell, it seems like a lot of “dotting i’s” and “crossing-t’s” which is never a bad thing.
Andy is more than a great writer — he’s a teacher, too. And you’ll see that in spades next week when his brand-new course Complete CSS is released one week from today on November 26.
As someone who also runs a front-end course, I can tell you it takes a non-trivial amount of time and effort to put something like Complete CSS together. I’ve been able to sneak peek at the course and like love how it’s made for many CSS-Tricks readers — you know CSS and use it regularly but need to ratchet it up from good to great. If my course is for those just getting into CSS, Andy will graduate you from hobbyist to practitioner in Complete CSS. It’s the perfect next step for narrowing the ever-growing learning gaps in this industry.
Early bird price is £189 (~$240) which is a steep cut from the full £249 (~$325) price tag.